Emisión de contaminantes a la atmósfera:
DOTSON, Greg. State Authority to Regulate Mobile Source Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Part 1: History and Current Challenge. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 11, noviembre 2019.
MESHER, Alex. The California Supreme Court on the Significance of Emissions under CEQA: Read Between the Lines. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 731-742. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38VQ2SB4N (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
SPOELMAN, Naomi. Urgenda: A How-To Guide for Enforcing Greenhouse Gas Emission Targets by Protecting Human Rights. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 751-760. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z382R3NX7G (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
THOMAS TRAHAN, Ryan. A Minimal Problem of Marginal Emissions. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 8, agosto 2019.
Energía:
BEAUDREAU, Tommy; SCHNEIDER, Janice; MARNITZ, Joshua. The Public’s Interest and Durable Management of Energy Development on Public Lands. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 8, agosto 2019.
FERNANDES, John. Weighting the Risks and Benefits of Energy Storage on Fleet Emissions: Academics vs. Fundamentals. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 8, agosto 2019.
FLEMING, Ruven. The “Trias”: A New Methodology for Energy Law. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 5, octubre 2019, pp. 164-175.
FOLEY HEIN, Jayni. Federal Lands and Fossil Fuels: Maximizing Social Welfare in Federal Energy Leasing. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 8, agosto 2019.
LIFSHITZ, Yael R. Private Energy. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, vol. 38, n. 2, junio 2019, pp. 119-163. Disponible en: https://law.stanford.edu/publications/private-energy/ (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
MCGEE, Alexandra; SWAROOP, Shalini. The Power of Power: Democratizing California’s Energy Economy to Align with Environmental Justice Principles through Community Choice Aggregation. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 46, n. 4, 2019, pp. 985-1016. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38XK84R0H (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
MORALES GUTIÉRREZ, Marcela; COLIN, María. Reflexiones acerca del amparo presentado en contra del Programa Sectorial de Energía 2020-2024. Derecho Ambiental y Ecología, n. 82, diciembre 2020, pp. 53-56. Disponible en: http://www.ceja.org.mx/IMG/Revista-82.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
O’CONNELL, Brian. A “Made in Qatar” Energy Transition Energy. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 6, diciembre 2019, pp. 226-230.
POWERS, Melissa. Zero-Sum Climate and Energy Politics Under the Trump Administration. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 9, septiembre 2019.
REVESZ, Richard L.; UNEL, Burcin. The Future of Energy Storage: Adopting Policies for a Cleaner Grid. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 8, agosto 2019.
ROSE, Julietta. The PURPA Haze: Clearing the Way for PURPA Implementation in a Changed Energy System. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 545-578. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38V698C8P (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
WELTON, Shelley; EISEN, Joel. Clean Energy Justice: Charting an Emerging Agenda. Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 43, n. 2, 2019. Disponible en: https://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2019/08/43.2-Welton-Eisen.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
Energía eléctrica:
DELLINGER, Myanna. Electric Utility Wildfire Liability Reform in California. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 11, noviembre 2019.
REVESZ, Richard L.; UNEL, Burcin. Managing the Future of the Electricity Grid: Modernizing Rate Design. Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 44, n. 1, 2020. Disponible en: https://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2020/04/44.1-Revesz-Unel.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
ZENZES CORDERA, Alexandra. Ley de la Industria Eléctrica en México. Derecho Ambiental y Ecología, n. 83, enero-abril 2021, pp. 49-54. Disponible en: http://www.ceja.org.mx/IMG/Revista-83.pdf(Fecha de último acceso 24-03-2021).
Energía eólica:
EDENS, Marga G.; LAVRIJSSEN, Saskia A. C. M. The energiewende as a Public Value Challenge for German DSOs. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 6, diciembre 2019, pp. 200-225.
MANJUR, Joya. The No CARB Diet: Should the California State Legislature Cut the California Air Resources Board Out of Its Emissions Reduction Regulatory Scheme?. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 709-718. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z383775W2F (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
NEWELL, Robert P. Transmission Impossible: The Case for a Nationwide Permit for Offshore Wind Transmission Lines. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 475-506. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38Z02Z92F (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
SILVESTRI, Florianne. Wind Power and the Legal Challenges with NEPA and the ESA. Sustainable Development and Law Policy, vol. 18, n. 2, 2018, pp. 18-49. Disponible en: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/41b5ba5b-8aa6-4980-965e-0ac1306cc0f8/AU_SDLP%20SPRING%202018.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Energía nuclear:
FISHMAN, Stephanie. A Nuclear Threat: The Tenth Circuit’s Shocking Misinterprettion of Preemption Demanding an Amendment to the Price-Anderson Act. Sustainable Development and Law Policy, vol. 18, n. 2, 2018, pp. 4-17. Disponible en: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/41b5ba5b-8aa6-4980-965e-0ac1306cc0f8/AU_SDLP%20SPRING%202018.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
MOHAM, M. P. Ram. Nuclear Energy: A. Nuclear Safety. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 151-154.
PUGA ÁLVAREZ, Cristina Valeria. Desarmar al ‘bárbaro’: Occidente y la cruzada contra la proliferación nuclear en Oriente Medio Relaciones Internacionales (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), n. 42, octubre 2019, pp. 197-217, Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15366/relacionesinternacionales2019.42.011 (Fecha de último acceso 14-04-2021).
RASSENFOSS, Mary. Unstable Elements: What the Fractured Decision in Virginia Uranium Means for the Future of Atomic Energy Act Preemption. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 507-544. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z380V89H9R (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
Energías renovables:
CONNOR, Sofia O’; MCELFISH, James; REYNOLDS, Lovinia. Corporate Renewable Energy Goals: What Does “100% Renewable” Really Mean?. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 7, julio 2019.
DEVAR, Subin G. Equitable Community Solar: California & Beyond. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 46, n. 4, 2019, pp. 1017-1048. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38057CS9H (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
FIELDS, Alexander. Will Section 94-C Enable Renewable Energy Project Siting and Help New York State Achieve Its Energy Targets?. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 46, n. 1, diciembre 2020, 54 p. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7916/cjel.v46i1.7916 (Fecha de último acceso 24-03-2021).
SCOVILLE, Delia. Taking Credit: How Congress Is Reshaping Renewable Energy Investment Incentives. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 743-750. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z386T0GX0H (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
SOKOLOWSKI, Maciej M. Renewable Energy Communities in the Law of the EU, Australia and New Zealand. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 2, abril 2019, pp. 34-46.
Espacios naturales protegidos:
MACNEILL, C. Mark. Canada’s Arctic Policy Framework: Governance Transformation in Nunavut?. Sustainable Development and Law Policy, vol. 20, n. 2, 2020, pp. 17-23. Disponible en: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/080465e2-c0a9-4c45-8835-7afd91ce165d/SDLP-V10%20Issue%202%20Spring%202020.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
MACNEILL, C. Mark. Splitting Canada’s Northern Strategy: Is it Polar Mania?. Sustainable Development and Law Policy, vol. 20, n. 2, 2020, pp. 13-16. Disponible en: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/080465e2-c0a9-4c45-8835-7afd91ce165d/SDLP-V10%20Issue%202%20Spring%202020.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
MEETARBHAN, Milan J. N. The 2010 Declaration of a Marine Protected Area around the Chagos Archipelago: Some Legal Reflections. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 15-37.
PISUPATI, Harsha; ROSENCRANZ, Armin. The Deteriorating Arctic and the Impact of the Shipping Industry. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 9, septiembre 2019.
PUIG MARCÓ, Roser. Antarctica. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 29, 2018, pp. 169-174.
RADOVICH, Violeta S. Gestión ambiental del Mar en la República Argentina: reflexiones sobre los parques interjurisdiccionales marino costeros y las áreas marinas protegidas. Gestión y Ambiente, vol. 22, n. 1, 2019, pp. 67-78. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v22n1.77181 (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
VANDERZWAAG, David L. Arctic. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 29, 2018, pp. 174-181.
VANDERZWAAG, David L. Arctic. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 182-189.
VITHANAGE, Achinthi C. A Deep Dive into the High Seas: Harmonizing Regional Frameworks for Marine Protected Areas with the UNCLOS Convention on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 63-84.
WILLIAMS, Maureen. Outer Space. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 175-181.
Especies amenazadas:
GEILING, Natasha. Can the Precautionary Principle Save the Endangered Species Act from an Uncertain Climate Future?. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 305-338. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38DR2P90N (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
MARIE, Brianna. Does Importing Endangered Species’ Body Parts Help Conservation? Discretion to Import Trophies Under the Trump Administration. Sustainable Development and Law Policy, vol. 19, n. 2, 2019, pp. 19-34. Disponible en: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/178b0ff6-2446-4e70-ab13-028f278c4ab7/231918_AU_SDLP_Spring2019_02%20(2).pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Especies invasoras:
COOK, Jetta. Giving a Hoot: Adaption of Conservation Laws to Address the Management of Invasive Species to Protect Spotted Owls. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 673-680. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38PK0728M (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
Ética medioambiental:
LININGER, Tom. Reforming Judicial Ethics to Promote Environmental Protection. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 8, agosto 2019.
Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental (EIA):
OFAK, Lana. Implementation of the Environmental Impact Assessment and the Appropriate Assessment in Marina Developments from the Viewpoint of the Newest EU Member State. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 3, junio 2019, pp. 82-91.
PCHALEK, Marcin. The Legalization of Unpermitted Projects in the Light of Requirements of the EIA Directive. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 3, junio 2019, pp. 100-106.
SISHEKANU, Makweti; KATATI, Morgan. Subjectivity in the Logic of Zambia’s Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) Process: The Bedrock of Controversial EIA Approvals. Law, Environment and Development Journal, vol. 17, n. 1, 2021, pp. 42-54. Disponible en: http://lead-journal.org/content/a1703.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Fauna:
CADDELL, Richard. Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 196-202.
Fiscalidad ambiental:
ELLIOTT, E. Donald. EPA’s Existing Authority to Impose a Carbon “Tax”. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 10, octubre 2019.
HORNBORG, Alf. Colonialism in the Anthropocene: the political ecology of the money-energy-technology complex. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, vol. 10, n. 1, marzo 2019. Disponible en: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/jhre/10-1/jhre.2019.01.01.xml (Fecha de último acceso 31-03-2021).
KEENE, Amelia. International Investment Developments. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 227-235.
MCGEE, Alexandra; SWAROOP, Shalini. The Power of Power: Democratizing California’s Energy Economy to Align with Environmental Justice Principles through Community Choice Aggregation. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 46, n. 4, 2019, pp. 985-1016. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38XK84R0H (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
MELTON, Michelle. The Constitutionality of Taxing Agricultural and Land Use Emissions. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 10, octubre 2019.
Ganadería:
KISIEL, Edwin. Using Indirect Regulation to Reduce Environmental Damage From Farming. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 9, septiembre 2019.
Industria:
ENABULELE, Osamuyimem. Mitigating the Effects of Environmental Degradation in the Oil Industry: An Assessment of Government Compensation Scheme in Nigeria. Law, Environment and Development Journal, vol. 16, n. 1, 2020, pp. 78-92. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00033064 (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Instrumentos y protocolos internacionales:
ASTORIA, Ross. The Clean Air Act, Pigouvian Pricing, and Climate Governance. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 12, diciembre 2019.
CAMARENA JUÁREZ, Francisco Javier. Retos y oportunidades de México, en relación con los Instrumentos Internacionales sobre Biodiversidad. Derecho Ambiental y Ecología, n. 82, diciembre 2020, pp. 29-32. Disponible en: http://www.ceja.org.mx/IMG/Revista-82.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
CRAIK, Neil; BURNS, William C. G. Climate Engineering Under the Paris Agreement.. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 12, diciembre 2019.
DAS, Kasturi; ASSELT, Harro van; DROEGE, Susanne; et al. Making the International Trade System Work for the Paris Agreement: Assessing the Options. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 6, junio 2019.
DEGIOIA, Matthew. Overboard? The Complexity of Traditional TMDL Calculations Under the Clean Water Act. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 12, diciembre 2019.
HEDEMANN-ROBINSON, Martin. The European Union’s Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) regime: overview of the evolution of the Union’s legal framework on combating illegal logging. Environmental Liability: Law, Policy and Practice, vol. 26, n. 2.
HEDEMANN-ROBINSON, Martin. The European Union’s Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) regime: overview of the evolution of the Union’s legal framework on combating illegal logging. Environmental Liability: Law, Policy and Practice, vol. 26, n. 2.
KRIKI, Lydia. Towards a Global Pact for the Environment: Some Legal Reflections. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 29, 2018, pp. 33-54.
MEHLING, Michael A. Governing Cooperative Approaches under the Paris Agreement. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 46, n. 3, 2019, pp. 765-827. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z389G5GD97 (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
PONCE-NAVA, Diana. Tratados internacionales, pendientes nacionales. Derecho Ambiental y Ecología, n. 82, diciembre 2020, pp. 47-52. Disponible en: http://www.ceja.org.mx/IMG/Revista-82.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
SACHS, Noah M. The Paris Agreements in the 2020s: Breakdown or Breakup?. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 46, n. 3, 2019, pp. 865-911. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38H708140 (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
SUSSMAN, Robert. Designing the New Green Deal: Where’s the Sweet Spot?. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 5, mayo 2019.
Inundaciones:
ADLER, Dena; BURGER, Michale; MOORE, Rob; et al. Changing the National Flood Insurance Program for a Changing Climate. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 4, abril 2019.
Medio marino:
AGUON, Julian; HUNTER, Julie. Second Wave Due Diligence: The Case for Incorporating Free, Prior, and Informed Consent into the Deep Sea Mining Regulatory Regime. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, vol. 38, n. 1, febrero 2019, pp. 3-55. Disponible en: https://law.stanford.edu/publications/second-wave-due-diligence-the-case-for-incorporating-free-prior-and-informed-consent-into-the-deep-sea-mining-regulatory-regime/ (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
CORCIONE, Elena. Regional Seas. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 139-143.
HARRISON, James. Ocean Dumping. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 146-150.
HARRISON, James. Ocean Dumping. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 29, 2018, pp. 152-156.
JONES, Shana; PIPPIN, J. Scott. Stabilizing the Edge: Southeastern and Mid-Atlantic Shorescapes Facing Sea-level Rise Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 46, n. S, febrero 2021. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7916/cjel.v46iS.8003 (Fecha de último acceso 24-03-2021).
KRSTEVSKA, Ana Nikodinovska. Regional Seas. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 29, 2018, pp. 141-148.
MEETARBHAN, Milan J. N. The 2010 Declaration of a Marine Protected Area around the Chagos Archipelago: Some Legal Reflections. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 15-37.
PHILIP, Olale; ODOTE, Collins; KIBUGI, Robert. Integrating Marine Spatial Planning in Governing Kenya’s Land-Sea Interface for A Sustainable Blue Economy. Law, Environment and Development Journal, vol. 16, n. 2, 2020, pp. 180-194. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00033484 (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
RADOVICH, Violeta S. Gestión ambiental del Mar en la República Argentina: reflexiones sobre los parques interjurisdiccionales marino costeros y las áreas marinas protegidas. Gestión y Ambiente, vol. 22, n. 1, 2019, pp. 67-78. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v22n1.77181 (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
SUMAN, Daniel O.; SHIVLANI, Manoj. Coastal Zone Management. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 202-211.
VITHANAGE, Achinthi C. A Deep Dive into the High Seas: Harmonizing Regional Frameworks for Marine Protected Areas with the UNCLOS Convention on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 63-84.
WARNOCK, Ceri. Deep Seabed and Ocean Floor. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 165-174.
WARNOCK, Ceri. Deep Seabed and Ocean Floor. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 29, 2018, pp. 161-169.
Medio rural:
DOMÍNGUEZ ÁLVAREZ, José Luis. La importancia del municipalismo para la consecución del nuevo resurgir de la ruralidad: La disyuntiva entre devolver el alma a los pueblos o abandonar el territorio. Revista jurídica de Castilla y León, n. 53, 2021. Disponible en: https://www.jcyl.es/web/jcyl/AdministracionPublica/es/Plantilla100Detalle/1131978346397/Publicacion/1285024111139/Redaccion (Fecha de último acceso 04-03-2021).
TRIANA ANCINEZ, Bryan et al. Peras con manzanas: comparación entre los objetivos constitucionales del acceso a la propiedad rural y la implementación de programas de formalización. Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, vol. 23, n. 1, enero-junio 2021, pp. 1-35, Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.9598 (Fecha de último acceso 14-04-2021).
WABELO, Temesgen Solomon. Approaches to Rural Land Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the Ethiopian Rural Land Legislations: Regional States Based Analysis. Law, Environment and Development Journal, vol. 16, n. 2, 2020, pp. 95-111. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00033480 (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Migración ambiental:
MÉNDEZ BARQUERO, Juan Carlos. Cambio Climático, Movilidad Humana y su Impacto en las Relaciones Internacionales del Siglo XXI. Revista Relaciones Internacionales (Universidad Nacional Costa Rica), vol. 90, n. 2, julio-diciembre 2017, pp. 1-17, Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15359/ri.90-2.2 (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
Minería:
AGUON, Julian; HUNTER, Julie. Second Wave Due Diligence: The Case for Incorporating Free, Prior, and Informed Consent into the Deep Sea Mining Regulatory Regime. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, vol. 38, n. 1, febrero 2019, pp. 3-55. Disponible en: https://law.stanford.edu/publications/second-wave-due-diligence-the-case-for-incorporating-free-prior-and-informed-consent-into-the-deep-sea-mining-regulatory-regime/ (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
CASSOTTA, Sandra; PACHECO CUEVA, Vladimir; RAFTOPOULOS, Malayna. A Case Study of the Carmichael Coal Mine from the Perspectives of Climate Change Litigation and Socio-Economic Factors. Law, Environment and Development Journal, vol. 17, n. 1, 2021, pp. 57-71. Disponible en: http://lead-journal.org/content/a1704.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Montes:
EZEIZABARRENA, Xabier. Naturaleza, Montañas y Riesgos. Perspectivas jurídicas. Abokatuok Revista del Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Gipuzkoa, n. 75, 2018, pp. 26-27. Disponible en: https://www.icagi.net/archivos/archivoszonapublica/publicaciones/ficheros/Abokatuok_N_75_Uztaila.Julio_2018_.pdf#page=26 (Fecha de último acceso 24-03-2021).
Organismos modificados genéticamente (OMG):
BATLLORI SAMPEDRO, Eduardo A. La declaración de zonas libres de cultivos con organismos genéticamente modificados. Competencias y Concurrencias. Caso de estudio: El Estado de Yucatán. Parte II. Derecho Ambiental y Ecología, n. 82, diciembre 2020, pp. 33-42. Disponible en: http://www.ceja.org.mx/IMG/Revista-82.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
Participación:
CERVANTES CHIQUITO, Sergio. Participación y consulta pública. El Estado debe garantizar este derecho en proyectos o actividades que puedan causar una afectación al medio ambiente. Derecho Ambiental y Ecología, n. 82, diciembre 2020, pp. 5-6. Disponible en: http://www.ceja.org.mx/IMG/Revista-82.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
JÁCOME PARADA, Eliana María; CLAVIJO MORA, Juliana Paola. La función ecológica de la propiedad y participación ambiental: dos promesas de la Constitución Ecológica de 1991. Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, vol. 23, n. 1, enero-junio 2021, pp. 1-28, Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.9583 (Fecha de último acceso 14-04-2021).
SELLHEIM, Nikolas. The Evolution of Local Involvement in International Conservation Law. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 29, 2018, pp. 77-102. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/yvz065 (Fecha de último acceso 13-04-2021).
Pesca:
ANGLIN TREAT, Sharon. Fixing a Broken System That Promotes Climate Change and Depletion of Global Fisheries: WTO Subsidy Reform Is Just the Tip of the (Melting) Iceberg. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 8, agosto 2019.
CALDERWOOD, Cayla. Climate-Driven Fishery Shifts: Framing the Problem & Proposing Solutions for Shifts Across Shared Borders. Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 44, n. 2, 2020. Disponible en: https://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2020/08/44.2-Calderwood.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
MEDINA, Monica; NUZUM, Scott. Electronic Reporting and Monitoring in Fisheries: Data Privacy, Security, and Management Challenges and 21st-Century Solutions. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 7, julio 2019.
MONACELLI, Nick. Food Security through Improved Enforcement Action against Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing in the Western Pacific. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 38-62.
WILSON, Chris. Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Swirling Uncertainty around the Definition of Habitat. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 761-770. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38BK16Q47 (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
Planeamiento urbanístico:
CHAVES GARCÍA, José Ramón. El planeamiento urbanístico: un kraken administrativo sometido jurisprudencialmente. El Consultor de los Ayuntamientos y de los Juzgados: revista técnica especializada en administración local y justicia municipal, n. 3, marzo 2021.
Política ambiental:
HONKOKEN, Tuula. Tackling Cookstove Emissions in India: Towards and Enabling Policy Environment and More Effective Legal Solution. Law, Environment and Development Journal, vol. 16, n. 2, 2020, pp. 197-213. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00033485 (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Prevención y control integrados de la contaminación (IPPC):
PROVOST, Graham. Rigorous and Relevant: Applying Lessons from the History of IPCC Special Reports to the Post-Paris Agreement World. Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 43, n. 2, 2019. Disponible en: https://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2019/08/43.2-Provost.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
Principio de precaución:
FOGELMAN, Valerie. Biodiversity damage from authorised activities: the polluter pays and precautionary principles and the significance threshold in the Environmental Liability Directive. Environmental Liability: Law, Policy and Practice, vol. 26, n. 2.
GEILING, Natasha. Can the Precautionary Principle Save the Endangered Species Act from an Uncertain Climate Future?. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 305-338. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38DR2P90N (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
Principio “Quien contamina paga”:
FOGELMAN, Valerie. Biodiversity damage from authorised activities: the polluter pays and precautionary principles and the significance threshold in the Environmental Liability Directive. Environmental Liability: Law, Policy and Practice, vol. 26, n. 2.
OMEDO, G; MUIGUA, K; MULWA, R. Financing Environmental Management in Kenya’s Extractive Industry: The Place of the Polluter Pays Principle. Law, Environment and Development Journal, vol. 16, n. 1, 2020, pp. 3-19. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00032457 (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Productos químicos:
GAVIRIA MESA, Jorge Iván; GRANDA VIVEROS, Mónica Lucía. Soberanía y ambiente en el marco de la Constitución de 1991: un análisis del uso y efectos del glifosato en la lucha antidrogas en Colombia. Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, vol. 23, n. 1, enero-junio 2021, pp. 1-28, Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.9571 (Fecha de último acceso 14-04-2021).
HOFMANN, Ekkehard. Regulation of Chemicals. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 160-163.
SACHS, Noah M. Toxic Floodwaters: Strengthening the Chemical Safety Regime for the Climate Change Era. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 46, n. 1, diciembre 2020, 52 p. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7916/cjel.v46i1.7914 (Fecha de último acceso 24-03-2021).
WATNICK, Valerie J. The Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act of 2016: Cancer, Industry Pressure, and a Proactive Approach. Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 43, n. 2, 2019. Disponible en: https://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2019/08/43.2-Watnick.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
Propiedad privada:
DIABATE, Alhousseini. Le droit foncier et la propriété privée collective en Afrique de l’Ouest francophone étude à partir de l’exemple du Mali. Law, Environment and Development Journal, vol. 17, n. 1, 2021, pp. 3-19. Disponible en: http://lead-journal.org/content/a1701.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
LIFSHITZ, Yael R. Private Energy. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, vol. 38, n. 2, junio 2019, pp. 119-163. Disponible en: https://law.stanford.edu/publications/private-energy/ (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Protección de especies:
AKERBOOM, Sanne; ANKER, Helle Tegner; BACKES, Chris; et al. Wild Energy Projects and Species Protection Law: A Comparative Analysis of the Application of EU Law in Five Member States. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 4, agosto 2019, pp. 144-158.
DICK, Vanessa. Dirty Money and Wildlife Trafficking: Using the Money Laundering Control Act to Prosecute Illegal Wildlife Trade. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 4, abril 2019.
SHAMSUL ABD AZIZ, Bin Ahmad; HOSSAIN, Mohammed Belayet; YEON, Asmah Laili Bt. Environmental Protection and the Bilateral Investment Treaties of Malaysia and Netherlands: A Comparison. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 5, octubre 2019, pp. 185-196.
ZELLMER, Sandra B.; PANARELLA, Samuel J.; WOOD, Oliver Finn. Species Conservation & Recovery Through Adequate Regulatory Mechanisms. Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 44, n. 2, 2020. Disponible en: https://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2020/08/44.2-Zellmer.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
Reciclaje:
CORTINAS, Cristina. Modelos de gobernanza y reciclaje incluyente para una economía circular comunitaria carbono neutra (primera parte). Derecho Ambiental y Ecología, n. 83, enero-abril 2021, pp. 27-34. Disponible en: http://www.ceja.org.mx/IMG/Revista-83.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 24-03-2021).
Recursos genéticos:
WINTER, Gerd. Problems and Solutions of Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing: A Theoretical Perspective – Part I. Law, Environment and Development Journal, vol. 17, n. 1, 2021, pp. 74-84. Disponible en: http://lead-journal.org/content/a1705.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Red Natura:
BARAN, Mariusz; IWANSKA, Barbara. Judicial Review of the Requirement to Integrate the Natura 2000 Sites Protection System in a Sustainable Forest Economy (illustrated with the example of the Bialowieza Forest Management Plan). European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 4, agosto 2019, pp. 110-130.
Reparación del daño ecológico:
ANNINK, Dionne; TASSET DE LANDTSHEER, Louis; HOFFMAN, Sonja Mareike; et al. Mitigation and Compensation Measures under the EU Habitats Directive in Selected Member States. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 1, febrero 2019, pp. 2-16.
BARRINGTON, Lindsey. Manufacturers Beware of Right to Repair: An Analysis of the Resurgence of Right to Repair & the Legal Consequences of Third-Party Access to Embedded Software in the ‘Internet of Things’ Era. Sustainable Development and Law Policy, vol. 20, n. 2, 2020, pp. 24-41. Disponible en: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/080465e2-c0a9-4c45-8835-7afd91ce165d/SDLP-V10%20Issue%202%20Spring%202020.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Residuos:
JACOTT, Marisa; COLIN, María. Modificaciones a la LGPGIR: Incinerando el futuro. Derecho Ambiental y Ecología, n. 83, enero-abril 2021, pp. 53-74. Disponible en: http://www.ceja.org.mx/IMG/Revista-83.pdf(Fecha de último acceso 24-03-2021).
KITUKU, Wambua; et al. Sectoral Coordination in Kenya’s Municipal Solid Waste Management: A Horizontal Assessment. Law, Environment and Development Journal, vol. 16, n. 1, 2020, pp. 57-75. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00033063 (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
SULLIVAN, Rachel. The D.C. Circuit Takes a Wrong Turn: Redefining Solid Waste Under RCRA. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 6, junio 2019.
Residuos radioactivos:
EZEIZABARRENA, Xabier. Residuos nucleares y responsabilidad. Abokatuok Revista del Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Gipuzkoa, n. 77, 2019, pp. 32-33. Disponible en: https://www.icagi.net/archivos/archivoszonapublica/publicaciones/ficheros/77-2019_1.pdf#page=32 (Fecha de último acceso 24-03-2021).
Responsabilidad Social Empresarial ( RSE ):
LORENZONI ESCOBAR, Lina. Responsabilidad social empresarial en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional colombiana: dimensiones de obligatoriedad en la voluntariedad. Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, vol. 23, n. 1, enero-junio 2021, pp. 1-23, Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.9085 (Fecha de último acceso 14-04-2021).
Salud:
VASQUEZ, Irene A. Restoring Reciprocal Relationships for Social and Ecological Health Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 46, n. 4, 2019, pp. 1049-1068. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38DV1CP36 (Fecha de último acceso 25-03-2021).
WATNICK, Valerie J. The Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act of 2016: Cancer, Industry Pressure, and a Proactive Approach. Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 43, n. 2, 2019. Disponible en: https://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2019/08/43.2-Watnick.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
Seguridad alimentaria:
MONACELLI, Nick. Food Security through Improved Enforcement Action against Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing in the Western Pacific. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 38-62.
Suelos:
MELTON, Michelle. The Constitutionality of Taxing Agricultural and Land Use Emissions. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 10, octubre 2019.
REYNEBEAU, Maja. The use of Private and Public Land for the Development of Heat Networks. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 28, n. 4, agosto 2019, pp. 131-143.
TERMYN, Christian. No Take Backs: Presidential Autohrity and Public Land Withdrawals. Sustainable Development and Law Policy, vol. 19, n. 2, 2019, pp. 4-18. Disponible en: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/178b0ff6-2446-4e70-ab13-028f278c4ab7/231918_AU_SDLP_Spring2019_02%20(2).pdf (Fecha de último acceso 12-04-2021).
Sustancias peligrosas:
SUZUKI, Yu. International Transfer of Restricted or Prohibited Substances. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 29, 2018, pp. 157-159.
SUZUKI, Yu. International Transfer of Restricted or Prohibites Substances. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol. 28, 2017, pp. 155-160.
Transportes:
CAMACHO, Alejandro E.; KELLY, Melissa L; MARANTZ, Nicholas J.; et al. Mitigating Climate Change Through Transportation and Land Use Policy. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 5, mayo 2019.
Urbanismo:
CAMACHO, Alejandro E.; KELLY, Melissa L; MARANTZ, Nicholas J.; et al. Mitigating Climate Change Through Transportation and Land Use Policy. The Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 49, n. 5, mayo 2019.
FUERTES LÓPEZ, F. Javier. Declaración de nulidad de instrumentos urbanísticos generales y obtención por silencio de licencias conformes a ese plan. análisis de la Sentencia del Tribunal Supremo 1717/2020 de 14 de diciembre de 2020. Revista Aranzadi Doctrinal, n. 3, 2021.
HERNÁNDEZ JIMÉNEZ, Hilario Manuel. El aprovechamiento urbanístico y su determinación. El Consultor de los Ayuntamientos y de los Juzgados: revista técnica especializada en administración local y justicia municipal, n. 3, marzo 2021.
KUTCHIN, Robert. Public Land Bargains, Revolutionary Rhetoric, and Building Trust. Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 47, n. 2, 2020, pp. 371-404. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38DN3ZW7B (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
OUTKA, Uma. State Lands in Modern Public Land Law. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, vol. 36, n. 2, abril 2017.
SQUILLACE, Mark. Rethinking Public Land Use Planning. Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 43, n. 2, 2019. Disponible en: https://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2019/08/43.2-Squillace.pdf (Fecha de último acceso 26-03-2021).
